And boy do they limit the resources. I wouldn't use shared hosting unless your website is dead. Because they will kick you off or upsell your hosting plan the first time you get any kind of traffic. And if you really want to go the shared hosting route, I would go with Known Host.The major drawbacks of shared hosting is you have limited bandwith and limited resources. If you receive a lot of traffic, shared hosting cannot handle it.
I use virtualmin and webmin on my VPS, and if you ask me they are easier to use than cPanel if you take the time out to learn it. And like you said, it's free, and you don't have to pay cPanel $15 a month.If you use a VPS and don't want to pay a whopping $15 a month extra, then you will need to resort to virtualmin and webmin which was what I was using.
I use virtualmin and webmin on my VPS, and if you ask me they are easier to use than cPanel if you take the time out to learn it. And like you said, it's free, and you don't have to pay cPanel $15 a month.
P.S. I HATE how everything is tied to a subscription these days.
Nothing wrong with that, cPanel is tried and true and has been around forever. Do you run this website on a VPS, or are you planning on getting a VPS soon?I just personally feel like something I'm going to put my heart and soul into like a website that I'd rather have cPanel.
Nothing wrong with that, cPanel is tried and true and has been around forever. Do you run this website on a VPS, or are you planning on getting a VPS soon?
My website is dead, and it hit the hosting limits anytime someone visited the website when it was on share hosting. Shared hosting has so many restrictions, even the $30 a month so-called semi dedicated have a lot of restrictions.
Your website is superfast, if you don't mind me asking, who is your web host, and what package do you have? I wouldn't mind getting rid of my VPS to save money, at least until my website grows.It was running on a VPS but I switched to shared just for cPanel because that's all that's needed. The host I chose doesn't restrict it to the point where you can't run the site with a lot of users. I did some research and it can handle it quite fine, especially because it's on the cloud where they give you a certain amount of RAM.
Your website is superfast, if you don't mind me asking, who is your web host, and what package do you have? I wouldn't mind getting rid of my VPS to save money, at least until my website grows.
For many website owners, shared hosting would absolutely work. I have been on Namecheap shared hosting since 2015 and I never have had any issue. Shared hosting is good for small websites and the websites that does not deal with ecommerce.And boy do they limit the resources. I wouldn't use shared hosting unless your website is dead. Because they will kick you off or upsell your hosting plan the first time you get any kind of traffic. And if you really want to go the shared hosting route, I would go with Known Host.
I have always used shared hosting aside from one time between I believe it was 2013 - 2017 when I was approached by the son of the other admin on my forum who offered me dedicated hosting for a reasonable price due to hosting issues I was having.
Unfortunately, the price of the dedicated hosting had to go up as he was no longer allowed to offer discounts and so now I use shared hosting again.
I don't think you would notice too much of a difference with a small website. It’s when the website gets busy is when you have a problem.Did you notice any considerable differences between the two(From a user perspective or webmaster perspective)?
I'm mainly thinking about speed which I don't think will be that noticeable if I have a small site but perhaps there's some other things I'm overlooking in which I should probably consider it.
That's my initial thought as well. I suppose I could prepare for a potential spike in traffic, but I don't think that's likely to happen.I don't think you would notice too much of a difference with a small website. It’s when the website gets busy is when you have a problem.